<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Direct Representation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com/articles/direct-representation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on economics and political economy from two students at the University of Washington</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Institutionally protected federalism under Direct Representation &#171; Good Morning, Economics</title>
		<link>http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com/articles/direct-representation/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>Institutionally protected federalism under Direct Representation &#171; Good Morning, Economics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com/articles/direct-representation/#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>[...] 18, 2007 in elections, federalism, public choice by jsalvati   In the past, I have advocated both Direct Representation, a form of proportional representation, and the institutional protection of federalism by having [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 18, 2007 in elections, federalism, public choice by jsalvati   In the past, I have advocated both Direct Representation, a form of proportional representation, and the institutional protection of federalism by having [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranked choice in Washington state &#171; Good Morning, Economics</title>
		<link>http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com/articles/direct-representation/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranked choice in Washington state &#171; Good Morning, Economics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com/articles/direct-representation/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>[...] will point out that Direct Representation would be a much better approach to proportional representation for multi-seat offices, especially [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will point out that Direct Representation would be a much better approach to proportional representation for multi-seat offices, especially [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campaign finance reform and Proportional Representation &#171; Good Morning, Economics</title>
		<link>http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com/articles/direct-representation/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Campaign finance reform and Proportional Representation &#171; Good Morning, Economics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodmorningeconomics.wordpress.com/articles/direct-representation/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] adopt a more proportional way of distributing voting power in the Senate and House. I will suggest Direct Representation, but Proportional Representation is a close substitute. When legislative votes are distributed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] adopt a more proportional way of distributing voting power in the Senate and House. I will suggest Direct Representation, but Proportional Representation is a close substitute. When legislative votes are distributed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
